# National Labor Relations Board v. Tak Trak, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · August 1, 1961 · 293 F.2d 270

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/254753

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TAK TRAK, INC., Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 1, 1961
- **Citations:** 293 F.2d 270; 48 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2855; 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 3794
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Orr, Barnes, Hamley
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/254753

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the Board) has petitioned this court for enforcement of its decree
*271
directing respondent Tak Trak to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to reinstate twenty-three named employees.
Respondent Tak Trak discharged its entire work force shortly after a majority of the workers had signed cards authorizing representation by Painters District Council No. 36 and Its Affiliated Unions, AFL-CIO (hereinafter the union).
The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., because of its coercive management tactics, because of the mass discharge, and because of a failure to bargain collectively with the union.
The sole question for decision is whether or not the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. A careful examination of the record convinces us that they are.
The petition of the Board for enforcement of its decree is granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/254753. Public record. Not legal advice.