# Brown v. Brown

> Missouri Court of Appeals · March 27, 2012 · 362 S.W.3d 508

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2542937

## Case

- **Full name:** Karen M. BROWN, Respondent, v. Anthony T. BROWN, Appellant
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 27, 2012
- **Citations:** 362 S.W.3d 508; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 406; 2012 WL 1032964
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2542937

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony T. Brown appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting his Family Access Motion and motions for contempt and to modify child support, but denying his motion to modify child custody. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare
*509
the law,
Murphy v. Carron,
536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion,
Andrews v. Andrews,
344 S.W.3d 749, 749 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2542937. Public record. Not legal advice.