# People v. Robinson

> California Supreme Court · June 9, 2004 · 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 210

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2508621

## Case

- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 9, 2004
- **Citations:** 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 210; 2004 Daily Journal DAR 6864; 91 P.3d 162; 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5018; 2004 Cal. LEXIS 4833
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** George
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2508621

## Opinion text

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 210 (2004)
91 P.3d 162
PEOPLE
v.
ROBINSON.
No. S123938.
Supreme Court of California.
June 9, 2004.
Petition for review granted; issues limited.
Respondent's petition for review GRANTED.
Defendant's petition for review DENIED.
The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following question: Where the trial court found a prima face case of Wheeler/Batson error with regard to the third African-American potential juror removed by the prosecutor by peremptory challenge ( People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 890 , 583 P.2d 748 ; Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 ), was the court required to obtain the prosecutor's reasons for removing each of the three African-American potential jurors or could the court limit its inquiry to the prosecutor's reasons for the third challenge?
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2508621. Public record. Not legal advice.