# Bynum v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD

> District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2000 · 96 F. Supp. 2d 4

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2421088

## Case

- **Full name:** Reverend Pierre BYNUM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, and United States Capitol Police, Defendants
- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** May 11, 2000
- **Citations:** 96 F. Supp. 2d 4; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7247; 2000 WL 686012
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion by Friedman
- **Judges:** Paul L. Friedman
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2421088

## Opinion text

ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendants’ cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification. Plaintiffs motion requests that the Court amend its March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment in this case to
*5
eliminate the final paragraph dismissing the case "with prejudice. Defendant’s cross-motion does not contest this amendment, but instead requests that the Court amend its Order and Judgment to approve the recent amendments to the Capitol Police’s regulations. Upon consideration of the parties’ motions, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED. The final ordering paragraph of the Court’s March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment was included as a result of a clerical error; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification is DENIED. The Capitol Police’s amended regulation is not before the Court; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment is VACATED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Amended Order and Judgment issued this same day.
SO ORDERED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2421088. Public record. Not legal advice.