# In Re Androgel Antitrust Litigation

> United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · June 5, 2009 · 622 F. Supp. 2d 1382

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2416013

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re ANDROGEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
- **Court:** United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
- **Decided:** June 5, 2009
- **Citations:** 622 F. Supp. 2d 1382; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49798; 2009 WL 1575539
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2416013

## Opinion text

ORDER DEEMING MOTION MOOT
Before the Panel is a motion by plaintiffs Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., and Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. (d/b/a SAJ Distributors), seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 , of the four actions on the attached schedule in the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
1
This matter was considered by the Panel at its hearing session in Louisville, Kentucky, on May 28, 2009. The Panel has now been advised that the listed District of New Jersey action was transferred to the Northern District of Georgia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 , in an order filed on June 3, 2009, thus depriving this litigation of its multidistrict character.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED MOOT.
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2060 — IN RE: ANDROGEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Northern District of Georgia
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 1:09-956
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.,
C.A. No. 1:09-957
Meijer, Inc., et al. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al,
C.A. No. 1:09-958
District of New Jersey
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc., et al. v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al,
C.A. No. 2:09-1507
1
. The motion originally encompassed three actions in the Central District of California; however, the Central District of California transferred those actions to the Northern District of Georgia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2416013. Public record. Not legal advice.