# National Labor Relations Board v. Cambria Clay Products Company

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · August 12, 1955 · 229 F.2d 433

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/238427

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CAMBRIA CLAY PRODUCTS COMPANY, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 12, 1955
- **Citations:** 229 F.2d 433; 36 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2714; 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4406
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Meallister, Miller, Gourley
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/238427

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The motion of the National Labor Relations Board that the Court reconsider its order of April 5, 1955 sustaining respondent’s motion of February 24, 1955, together with its suggestion for en banc reconsideration, having been considered by the Court;
And the Court being of the opinion that the uniform procedure heretofore followed by the Court should not be departed from, namely, that in cases where the appeal was heard, and the judgment or order complained of was decided, by a regular Court consisting of three judges only, a petition to rehear or to reconsider should not be considered by the Court en banc;
It Is Ordered that said motion to reconsider is overruled. Sec. 160(e), Title
*434
29, U.S.C.A.; Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 334 U.S. 62 , 68 S.Ct. 972 , 92 L.Ed. 1212 ; N. L. R. B. v. National Gas Co., 8 Cir., 215 F.2d 160 ; Compare: Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co., 309 U.S. 23 , 60 S.Ct. 416 , 84 L.Ed. 558 , rehearing denied, 309 U.S. 695 , 60 S.Ct. 585 , 84 L.Ed. 1035 ; Schilder v. Gusik, 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 662, 664 .
Judge McALLISTER is of the opinion that the motion to reconsider should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/238427. Public record. Not legal advice.