# Potomac Engineers, Incorporated v. Daniel Walser, Chairman, Comprising the District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · June 9, 1955 · 223 F.2d 356

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/236946

## Case

- **Full name:** POTOMAC ENGINEERS, Incorporated, Appellant, v. Daniel WALSER, Chairman, Et Al., Comprising the District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers, Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** June 9, 1955
- **Citations:** 223 F.2d 356; 96 U.S. App. D.C. 64; 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3971
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Bastian, Edgerton, Fahy, Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/236946

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the corporation appellant (plaintiff) may be registered as a professional engineer under the Professional Engineers’ Registration Act.
1
The District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional Engineers denied appellant’s application to register it and to admit it to practice professional engineering in the District of Columbia. The application was denied on the ground that it is not possible to register corporations under the Act. Thereupon this action was instituted, asking a mandatory injunction directing the Board to issue the license.
The District Court held, on cross motions for summary judgment, that “the statute must be construed by its very terms as inapplicable to corporations and applicable to natural persons only.” 127 F.Supp. 41, 42 . We agree.
Affirmed.
1
. 64 Stat. 854 , ch. 953, Sees. 2-1801 through 2-1818, District of Columbia Code 1951.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/236946. Public record. Not legal advice.