# Rafferty v. Schatzman

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · October 28, 1963 · 81 N.J. Super. 64

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2319495

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** October 28, 1963
- **Citations:** 81 N.J. Super. 64; 194 A.2d 591
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judges Goldmann, Kilkenny and Collester
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2319495

## Opinion text

81 N.J. Super. 64 (1963)
194 A.2d 591
JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 28, 1963.
Decided October 28, 1963.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.
Mr. John J. Rafferty argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for respondents Schatzman and Biro.
Mr. John A. Lynch appeared for respondent Middlesex Democratic County Committee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge HALPERN, 81 N.J. Super. 58 ( Law Div. 1963). We consider the statute, N.J.S.A. 19:27-11, as completely controlling.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2319495. Public record. Not legal advice.