# National Labor Relations Board v. Michalik

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · December 19, 1952 · 201 F.2d 48

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/230769

## Case

- **Full name:** National Labor Relations Board v. Michalik
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 19, 1952
- **Citations:** 201 F.2d 48; 31 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2264; 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3518
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Martin, McALLISTER, Miller, Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/230769

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the Board’s findings that respondent violated Section 8(a) (1, 3, 5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1, 3, 5), are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; that the denial of respondent’s mo-tion for continuance did not constitute an abuse of discretion or result in the denial of due process of law; and that compliance with the filing requirements of Section 9(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159 (f), need not be alleged and proved as a condition precedent to the exercise of jurisdiction over a labor controversy by the Board, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/230769. Public record. Not legal advice.