# Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · January 17, 1951 · 11 N.J. Super. 433

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2302579

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** January 17, 1951
- **Citations:** 11 N.J. Super. 433; 78 A.2d 429
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogers
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2302579

## Opinion text

11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)
78 A.2d 429
CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 2, 1951.
Decided January 17, 1951.
*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.
Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.
Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2302579. Public record. Not legal advice.