# Vine v. Commonwealth

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · March 27, 2009 · 600 Pa. 625

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2276156

## Case

- **Full name:** Teresa M. VINE, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 27, 2009
- **Citations:** 600 Pa. 625; 969 A.2d 1175; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 508
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2276156

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is as follows:
Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that Petitioner had to demonstrate either that SERS did not act in good faith or that SERS had reasonable cause to question the validity of the power of attorney and apparent authority in order for Petitioner to prevail?

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2276156. Public record. Not legal advice.