# O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · December 29, 2009 · 605 Pa. 129

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2271496

## Case

- **Full name:** Cozen O’CONNOR, Petitioner v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF ETHICS and City of Philadelphia, Respondents
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 29, 2009
- **Citations:** 605 Pa. 129; 987 A.2d 715; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2896
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2271496

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did Cozen O’Connor have standing to obtain a declaratory judgment where Cozen O’Connor alleged in its complaint that it intended to forgive the outstanding debt of the Friends of Bob Brady Campaign Committee at one time and
in toto,
thereby exposing itself to potential civil penalties
*130
and other sanctions under Phila. Code § 20-612 for violations of Phila. Code § 20-1002?

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2271496. Public record. Not legal advice.