# McQueen v. Brown

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · October 10, 2002 · 175 N.J. 200

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2258209

## Case

- **Full name:** Patricia McQueen, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James Brown and Steven Cook, Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** October 10, 2002
- **Citations:** 175 N.J. 200; 814 A.2d 1042; 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1305
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Poritz, Coleman, Long, Verniero, Lavecchia, Zazzali, Pressler
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2258209

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Eichen’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 342
N.J.Super.
120 , 775 A.2d 748 (2001).
*201
For affirmance
— Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and Judge PRESSLER (temporarily assigned) — 7.
Opposed
— None.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2258209. Public record. Not legal advice.