# Kurtz v. Oremland

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · November 22, 1954 · 16 N.J. 454

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2206202

## Case

- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** November 22, 1954
- **Citations:** 16 N.J. 454; 109 A.2d 286
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2206202

## Opinion text

16 N.J. 454 (1954)
109 A.2d 286
JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BENJAMIN OREMLAND, PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DUNN'S ENGLISH LEATHER SHOP, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LOUIS W. DUNN AND JESSIE R. DUNN, AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 8, 1954.
Argued November 15, 1954.
Decided November 22, 1954.
Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Greene & Hellring, attorneys).
Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J. Super. 443 ( Ch. Div. 1954).
For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.
For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN — 3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2206202. Public record. Not legal advice.