# George v. Livingston Parish Bd

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · September 11, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/21884

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 11, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/21884

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the law was uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious speech in a valedictory address

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-30647
_____________________

LARONDA GEORGE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD;
RICK WENTZEL; LOUIS SCHULTZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Middle District of Louisiana
(U.S.D.C. No. 98-CV-466-B)
_______________________________________________________
September 8, 2000

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Laronda George appeals from the qualified-immunity dismissal of her claims

against appellees Rick Wentzel and Louis Schultz. We affirm because no

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
constitutional violation of George’ rights under clearly established law was alleged.

See Guidry v. Broussard, 897 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1990) (holding that the law was

uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious

speech in a valedictory address). Appellees were therefore entitled to qualified

immunity.

AFFIRMED.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/21884. Public record. Not legal advice.