# Maupin v. Howard County Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/216942

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 18, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/216942

## Opinion text

Filed: May 18, 2011

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1895
(1:08-cv-02203-BPG)

MICHELLE MAUPIN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION; RESTIA WHITAKER, individually and in his
official capacity; CHRISTIAN J. CALLENDER, individually and
in his official capacity; JOHN L. SEIBEL, individually and
in his official capacity; ROBYN MCDONALD, individually and
in her official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

O R D E R

The Court amends its opinion filed April 1, 2011, as

follows:

On page 2, second line of text –- the words “granting

summary judgment for the defendants” are substituted for the

words “dismissing her civil complaint.”

For the Court – By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1895

MICHELLE MAUPIN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION; RESTIA WHITAKER, individually and in his
official capacity; CHRISTIAN J. CALLENDER, individually and
in his official capacity; JOHN L. SEIBEL, individually and
in his official capacity; ROBYN MCDONALD, individually and
in her official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge.
(1:08-cv-02203-BPG)

Submitted: March 24, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle Maupin, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Lisa Y.
Settles, HODES, PESSIN & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Michelle Maupin appeals the magistrate judge’s order

granting summary judgment for the defendants. * We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard

Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:08-cv-02203-BPG (D. Md. July 15,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

*
This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the
parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/216942. Public record. Not legal advice.