# Brown v. Massengill

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/215568

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 27, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/215568

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6286

VINCENT BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM KEVIN MASSENGILL, Individually and in his official
capacity; JOHN C. BLAIR, II, Individually and in his
official capacity; LISA CARUSO, Individually and in her
official capacity as Commonwealth Prosecutor; EDWARD K.
NICKEL, Individually and in his official capacity as
Assistant Prosecutor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00385-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Vincent Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Massengill, No. 1:10-cv-00385-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va.

Feb. 16, 2011). We deny Brown’s motions for appointment of

counsel, for a transcript at Government expense, and for

reconsideration of the initial deferral of those motions. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/215568. Public record. Not legal advice.