# Pryce v. Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 11, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214401

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 11, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214401

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1003

PETER PRYCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:07-cv-03284-CBD)

Submitted: February 14, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas B. Corbin, THOMAS B. CORBIN, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellant. Linda Hitt Thatcher, Robert J. Baror, THATCHER LAW
FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Peter Pryce appeals the magistrate judge’s order

entering judgment for the Appellee following the jury’s verdict

in favor of the Appellee on Pryce’s claim of retaliation. As

Pryce failed to file a post-verdict motion pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 50, and failed to move for a new trial pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 59, however, this court is without power to review

his claim regarding the sufficiency of the evidence. See

Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift-Erich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394,

400-07 (2006); see also A Helping Hand, LLC v. Baltimore County,

515 F.3d 356, 369-70 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we affirm

the magistrate judge’s order. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214401. Public record. Not legal advice.