# Brown v. Hathaway

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 6, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214143

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 6, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214143

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7720

SAMUEL L. BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY HATHAWAY; LILLIAN GILLIAM; LT. BIGGS; MS. WALTON,

Defendants– Appellees,

and

A. SPRUILL; GIBBS; SANDERLIN; C/O BROWN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03004-BO)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown V. Hathaway, No. 5:09-ct-03004-BO (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 29, 2009; Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/214143. Public record. Not legal advice.