# Anthony Jackson v. Medical Board of California

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · March 25, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/213324

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 25, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/213324

## Opinion text

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

ANTHONY JACKSON, M.D., No. 08-56758

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-02188-SVW-RZ
Central District of California,
v. Los Angeles

MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA,
ORDER AMENDING
Defendant - Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

We grant appellee’s request to take judicial notice of the California State Bar

Association records involving Walter J. Roberts IV. We deny as unnecessary the

request to take judicial notice of the motions filed with the district court.

Judge Graber votes to grant the petition for panel rehearing in full. Judges

B. Fletcher and Pregerson vote to grant the petition for panel rehearing in part, to

the extent necessary to correct Roberts’s status, and vote to deny the petition for

panel rehearing in all other respects.

In line two of page three of the memorandum disposition filed on February

18, 2011, the word “disbarred” shall be replaced with the word “suspended” to

correctly reflect the status of Jackson’s former counsel. No further petitions for

panel rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be entertained.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/213324. Public record. Not legal advice.