# Kelly v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 18, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/212752

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 18, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/212752

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1554

SHANNON KELLY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, a West Virginia state
agency; LAWRENCE M. SHULTZ, in his official capacity as
President of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners;
ANCIL G. RAMEY, in his official capacity as Vice-President
of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; SUE ANN
HOWARD, in her official capacity as a member of the West
Virginia Board of Law Examiners; WARD D. STONE, JR., in his
official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of
Law Examiners; BRADLEY J. PYLES, in his official capacity
as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners;
SARAH N. HALL, in her official capacity as a member of the
West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; JOHN F. CYRUS, in his
official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of
Law Examiners,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber,
Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00933-DAF)

Submitted: February 11, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shannon Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges, Stephanie
Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
PER CURIAM:

Shannon Kelly appeals the district court’s order

entering judgment in favor of the Respondents in his complaint

alleging Americans with Disabilities Act, due process, and equal

protection violations. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Kelly v. West Virginia Bd. of Law

Exam’rs., No. 2:08-cv-00933-DAF (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 31 & Apr. 16,

2010). We deny the Appellees’ motion to strike the Appellant’s

informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/212752. Public record. Not legal advice.