# Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corp. > Supreme Court of New Jersey · June 13, 1960 · 33 N.J. 72 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1955577 ## Case - **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey - **Decided:** June 13, 1960 - **Citations:** 33 N.J. 72; 161 A.2d 474 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Judges:** Per Curiam - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1955577 ## Opinion text 33 N.J. 72 (1960) 161 A.2d 474 BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued June 6, 1960. Decided June 13, 1960. Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, attorneys; Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer, of counsel). Mr. David Friedenberg argued the cause for the respondents Francis X. Conway, et al. ( Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier, attorney). Mr. Philip J. Albert argued the cause for the respondent Benjamin Applestein ( Messrs. Levy, Levy & Albert, attorneys). Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the case for the respondent United Board & Carton Corporation ( Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss, on the brief). Mr. Raymond Chasan argued the cause for the respondents Martha U. Beuerlein, et al. ( Messrs. Levy, Lemken & Margulies, attorneys; Mr. Seymour Margulies, of counsel). *73 PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below. For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7. For reversal — None. --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1955577. Public record. Not legal advice.