# INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler

> Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · April 4, 1983 · 457 A.2d 1122

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1954800

## Case

- **Full name:** INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Hadley R. CHANDLER
- **Court:** Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
- **Decided:** April 4, 1983
- **Citations:** 457 A.2d 1122; 1983 Me. LEXIS 664
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Godfrey, Nichols, Carter, Violette, Wathen
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1954800

## Opinion text

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this action the Defendant, Hadley R. Chandler, appeals a judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County) entered October 20, 1982, which vacated a decision by the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals holding that a mobile home park owned by the Defendant constituted a nonconforming use under the Pittsfield zoning ordinance. The Superior Court remanded the case to the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals, directing a further remand to the Town’s Planning Board for a hearing on the special exception permit application originally filed by the Defendant.
It is well-established that Superior Court judgments which vacate and remand
*1123
for further proceedings are interlocutory in nature and are not final judgments reviewable by this Court.
Harris Baking Company v. Maine Employment Security Commission,
457 A.2d 427, 428 (Me.1983);
Mac-Dougall
v.
MacDougall,
403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).
Accordingly, the entry is:
Appeal dismissed.
All concurring.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1954800. Public record. Not legal advice.