# Yates v. Township of McKean

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · September 26, 2007 · 593 Pa. 436

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1953731

## Case

- **Full name:** John YATES and John L. Dombrowski, v. TOWNSHIP OF McKEAN, Erie County, Pennsylvania, Edward Hess, Supervisor, James Guckes, Supervisor, McKean Township Sewer Authority, Karl Hughes, Member, Michael Wheeling, Member, Elizabeth Riechert, Member, Eric Dedrick, an Individual, and Edward Hess, Individually. Appeal of Edward Hess, Individual and Eric Dedrick, Individual. Appeal of Edward Hess, Individual and Eric Dedrick, Individual
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** September 26, 2007
- **Citations:** 593 Pa. 436; 931 A.2d 639; 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2009
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Cappy, Eakin
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1953731

## Opinion text

931 A.2d 639 (2007)
John YATES and John L. Dombrowski,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF McKEAN, Erie County, Pennsylvania, Edward Hess, Supervisor, James, Guckes, Supervisor, McKean Township Sewer Authority, Karl Hughes, Member, Michael Wheeling, Member, Elizabeth Riechert, Member, Eric Dedrick, an Individual, and Edward Hess, Individually.
Appeal of Edward Hess, Individual and Eric Dedrick, Individual.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 26, 2007.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2007, the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County is affirmed.
Chief Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.
Justice EAKIN files a concurring statement.
Chief Justice CAPPY, concurring.
I join the Court in its per curiam order. Although I previously joined Mr. Justice Eakin in his dissenting opinion in Burger v. School Board of the McGuffey School District, 923 A.2d 1155 (2007), that case now stands as a majority precedent in this Court, and therefore, stare decisis in this instance.
*640 Justice EAKIN, concurring.
I join the per curiam affirmance. While I remain of the opinion expressed in my dissent in Burger v. School Board of the McGuffey School District, 923 A.2d 1155, 1167 (2007) (Eakin, J., dissenting), I recognize the precedential value of Burger's majority.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1953731. Public record. Not legal advice.