# Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · December 21, 2005 · 585 Pa. 44

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1909144

## Case

- **Full name:** Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI T/D/B/A Saturn Surplus v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 21, 2005
- **Citations:** 585 Pa. 44; 887 A.2d 1238; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2927
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1909144

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in
Althaus v. Cohen,
562 Pa. 547 , 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1909144. Public record. Not legal advice.