# Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 2, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/184095

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 2, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/184095

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6238

BRADLEY CARL BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Warden; AL
HAYNES, Warden; D. E. GILL, Associate Warden; HAROLD TAYLOR,
Associate Warden; V. DUPUIS, S.I.S. Lieutenant; D. MURPHY,
Lieutenant,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00083-FPS-JES)

Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: February 2, 2011

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Carl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Bradley Carl Brown appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:08-cv-00083-FPS-

JES (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/184095. Public record. Not legal advice.