# Chestnut v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 3, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174792

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 3, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174792

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6792

SIM CHESTNUT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANGELA R. BROWN; JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; GREGORY
KNOWLIN, Warden Turbeville Correctional Institute; RICHARD
COCHRAN, Associate Warden Turbeville Correctional
Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(9:09-cv-01418-RBH)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sim Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. John Betts McCutcheon, Jr.,
Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Sim Chestnut appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Chestnut v. Brown, No. 9:09-cv-01418-RBH (D.S.C. May 25, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174792. Public record. Not legal advice.