# Brown v. Mathena

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 3, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174791

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 3, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174791

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6772

CLAYTON BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

R. C. MATHENA, Warden; OFFICER MITCHELL; SERGEANT SHRIEVE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va.

May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/174791. Public record. Not legal advice.