# Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving

> Texas Supreme Court · February 16, 1994 · 868 S.W.2d 750

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1728689

## Case

- **Full name:** DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, a Joint Board of the City of Dallas, Texas and the City of Fort Worth, Texas Et Al., Petitioners, v. the CITY OF IRVING, Texas Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** Texas Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 16, 1994
- **Citations:** 868 S.W.2d 750
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1728689

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The principal issue in this case is whether the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board must comply with the local zoning ordinances adopted by the surrounding cities of Irving, Euless, and Grapevine to expand and develop the airport. The Board asserts that the zoning ordinances are preempted by both federal law and the Texas Municipal Airports Act (“TMAA”).
See
Tex.Rev.Civ. StatAnn. art. 46d-14 (Vernon 1993).
While this appeal was pending, the Texas Legislature enacted Senate Bill 348, which amends the relevant portions of the TMAA. Tex. Municipal Airports Act, ch. 93, § 4,1993 Tex.Sess.Law Serv. 182 (Vernon). Because the amendments took effect May 6,1993, the injunction judgment before this court is no longer based on currently applicable state law.
We express no opinion on whether federal law preempts the ordinances or on the validity, constitutionality, or applicability of the TMAA amendments. We grant in part petitioner’s motion to vacate the judgments of the lower courts because the amendments set out in Senate Bill 348 must be considered and may be dispositive. We vacate the judgments of the courts below and remand this cause to the trial court for consideration of the amended TMAA and further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1728689. Public record. Not legal advice.