# Vedutis v. SO. PLAINFIELD BD. OF ED.

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · June 15, 1976 · 142 N.J. Super. 492

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1538379

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** June 15, 1976
- **Citations:** 142 N.J. Super. 492; 362 A.2d 51
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judges Kole, Ard and E. Gaulkin
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1538379

## Opinion text

142 N.J. Super. 492 (1976)
362 A.2d 51
DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted June 7, 1976.
Decided June 15, 1976.
*493 Before Judges KOLE, ARD and E. GAULKIN.
Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun, attorney for the appellant.
Messrs. Mulligan & Altman, attorneys for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N.J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).
In view of our disposition of the matter, we need not consider the issue of informal or substantial compliance which was also raised on this appeal.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1538379. Public record. Not legal advice.