# In RE ORACLE CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION v. Oracle Corp.

> Supreme Court of Delaware · April 14, 2005 · 872 A.2d 960

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1532274

## Case

- **Court:** Supreme Court of Delaware
- **Decided:** April 14, 2005
- **Citations:** 872 A.2d 960; 2005 WL 877903
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 35 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1532274

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding “[b]ecause, by their very nature, predictions of the future are less certain than statements about past events, courts have been less apt to find forward-looking statements material and have been more dubious of claims that it was reasonable for investors to rely upon …
- clarifying the elements a plaintiff must show to prevail on a Brophy claim

## Opinion text

872 A.2d 960 (2005)
IN RE ORACLE CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION,
BARONE v. ORACLE CORP.
No. 561, 2004.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
April 14, 2005.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1532274. Public record. Not legal advice.