# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 25, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/149538

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 25, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/149538

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BOBBY JAMES BROWN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:00-
cr-00100-AMD-1)

Submitted: June 16, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby James Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Bobby James Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Brown, No. 1:00-cr-00100-AMD-1 (D. Md. April 22,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/149538. Public record. Not legal advice.