# Spuck v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · March 26, 2010 · 605 Pa. 409

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1485074

## Case

- **Full name:** Daniel L. SPUCK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Et Al., Appellees
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 26, 2010
- **Citations:** 605 Pa. 409; 990 A.2d 725
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1485074

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
1
1
. Additionally, we hereby deny Appellant’s “Motion for Permission to Attach Exhibits” filed on December 13, 2009. Certain of the exhibits Appellant seeks to attach to his brief are dehors the record and cannot be considered. See
Commonwealth v. Bracalielly,
540 Pa. 460 , 658 A.2d 755, 763 (1995) (law of Pennsylvania is well settled that matters which are not of record cannot be considered on appeal).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1485074. Public record. Not legal advice.