# Brannock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · October 30, 1963 · 260 N.C. 426

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1243990

## Case

- **Full name:** GEORGE L. BRANNOCK and HOYT C. HOILMAN v. ZONING BOARD of ADJUSTMENT: J. A. HANCOCK, Chairman; CARL DULL, JR., Vice Chairman; ROY SETZER; A. T. HARRINGTON; C. C. SMITHDEAL, JR.; DOUGLAS B. ELAM; And WILLIAM F. THOMAS
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** October 30, 1963
- **Citations:** 260 N.C. 426; 132 S.E.2d 758; 1963 N.C. LEXIS 713
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1243990

## Opinion text

*427
Per Curiam.
The petitioners raise a number of objections to tibe granting of the special use permit, among them that tibe membership of the Zoning Board of Adjustment changed between the original 'hearing ,and the final approval of the application. However, the changes in membership did mot break the continuity of the Board. The new members had access to .the minutes and records of the various healings and the required majority participated and joined in all decisions. The Zoning Code provides the conditions under which special permits may issue. The findings .are ample to .sustain the action of the Zoning Board of Adjustment in issuing the special use permit under its discretionary powers. The order of Judge Fountain is
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1243990. Public record. Not legal advice.