# Smith v. Brown

> Supreme Court of Georgia · October 19, 2009 · 286 Ga. 137

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1201017

## Case

- **Full name:** SMITH v. BROWN (Two Cases)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Georgia
- **Decided:** October 19, 2009
- **Citations:** 286 Ga. 137; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3330; 686 S.E.2d 760; 2009 Ga. LEXIS 630
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion by Nahmias
- **Judges:** Nahmias
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1201017

## Opinion text

NAHMIAS, Justice.
Arlanda Smith is the defendant in a pending criminal prosecution. He filed this pre-trial habeas corpus petition raising numerous issues regarding that prosecution, including a claim that the trial court presiding over his prosecution should be recused. The habeas court denied relief on the ground that, because he could assert these issues in his pending criminal case, habeas relief was unavailable to Smith. In these two appeals, Smith contends the habeas court erred. On the contrary, the habeas court properly ruled that Smith could assert all of the claims he raises in his pending prosecution and that “pre-trial habeas corpus relief cannot be predicated” on those claims.
Mungin v. St. Lawrence,
281 Ga. 671, 672 ( 641 SE2d 541 ) (2007);
Perera v. Miller,
283 Ga. 583 ( 662 SE2d 544 ) (2008). Accordingly, we affirm the habeas court’s judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1201017. Public record. Not legal advice.