# Brown > District Court, E.D. California · July 7, 2026 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11390162 ## Case - **Full name:** LEWIS DEWANE BROWN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CITY OF FRESNO, et al. - **Court:** District Court, E.D. California - **Decided:** July 7, 2026 - **Opinion:** 100trialcourt - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11390162 ## Opinion text 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No. 22-cv-00216-JLT-SAB 12 LEWIS DEWANE BROWN, SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P 16) individually and on behalf of all others 13 similarly situated, Phased Discovery and Motion Deadlines: Initial Disclosures: 14 Plaintiff, August 6, 2026 Certification Non-Expert Discovery: 15 June 4, 2027 Certification Expert Disclosure: 16 v. July 30, 2027 Certification Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: 17 August 27, 2027 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., Certification Expert Discovery: 18 October 15, 2027 Defendants. Certification Motion Filing: 19 Jan 26, 2028 Opposition and Reply: By Local Rule 20 21 I. Date of Scheduling Conference 22 The Scheduling Conference was held via videoconference on July 7, 2026. 23 II. Appearances of Counsel 24 Kevin G. Little appeared via video on behalf of Plaintiff Lewis Dewane Brown. 25 Nichole M. Santiago appeared via video on behalf of Defendants City of Fresno, Mayor 26 Jerry Dyer, Lt. Robert Beckwith, Officer Gary Holden, Officer Andrew Diaz, and Officer 27 Nicholas Quisenberry. 28 Bruce J. Berger appeared via video on behalf of Defendant Sgt. Troy Miller. 1 III. Consent to Magistrate Judge 2 The parties have not consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 3 to the parties who have not consented to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including 4 trial, before United States Magistrate Judge Stanely A. Boone, you should be informed that 5 because of the pressing workload of United States district judges and the priority of criminal 6 cases under the United States Constitution, you are encouraged to consent to magistrate judge 7 jurisdiction in an effort to have your case adjudicated in a timely and cost-effective manner. Any 8 criminal trial set which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the civil trial was set 9 first. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer be entertained, absent 10 a specific and stated finding of good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or 11 week to week until the completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case. The parties 12 are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without 13 adverse substantive consequences. 14 IV. Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 15 The parties shall complete the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), on 16 or before August 6, 2026. 17 V. Amendments to Pleading 18 Amendments to pleading shall be completed by January 15, 2027. The parties are 19 advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not 20 reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if 21 necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. 23 Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product 25 of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 26 (1962). 27 VI. Class Certification 28 The Court shall order a phased approach to this action. This first phase shall relate to 1 class certification. Any motion for class certification or motion to deny class certification shall be 2 filed on or before January 26, 2028. Opposition and reply briefs shall be filed in accordance 3 with Local Rule 230. The parties are encouraged to meet and confer at the appropriate time and 4 submit a stipulation expanding such briefing periods as necessary. 5 Following the disposition of the issue of class certification, including a failure to file a 6 motion for class certification by the above deadline, the Court will set a subsequent scheduling 7 conference in order to set a merits scheduling order, including a trial date. At any time during 8 this phase of discovery should plaintiff(s) determine that the issue of class certification is no 9 longer warranted, they should promptly inform the Court so that it may likewise set a subsequent 10 scheduling conference. 11 VII. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates 12 The parties are ordered to complete all certification non-expert discovery on or before 13 June 4, 2027, and all certification expert discovery on or before October 15, 2027. 14 The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before July 30, 15 2027, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before August 27, 2027. The written designation 16 of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), 17 (B) and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate 18 experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other 19 evidence offered through the experts that are not properly disclosed in compliance with this order 20 in relation to the issue of class certification. 21 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 22 experts and their opinions relating to class certification or opposition thereof. Experts must be 23 fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the designation. Failure to 24 comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include striking the expert 25 designation and the exclusion of their testimony. 26 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 27 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. 28 The parties are cautioned that the discovery cut-off deadlines are the dates by which all 1 discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be heard after the 2 discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery 3 motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant 4 discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served 5 sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and 6 confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to 7 compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing discovery 8 deadlines. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel be filed and 9 heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief 10 within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently 11 in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 12 VIII. Pre-Trial Motions 13 Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 14 moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five 15 (25) pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before 16 scheduling any motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rules 17 230 and 251. 18 A. Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 19 As noted, all certification non-expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be 20 completed no later than June 4, 2027, and certification expert discovery shall be completed no 21 later than October 15, 2027. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel 22 be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant 23 effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute 24 heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as 25 untimely. Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before United States 26 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9. 27 In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications 28 for an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not 1 obtain an Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 2 Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the parties must 3 prepare and file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”) as required by 4 Local Rule 251. The Joint Statement must be filed fourteen (14) calendar days before the 5 scheduled hearing date. Courtesy copies of all motion-related documents, declarations, and 6 exhibits must be delivered to the Clerk’s Office by 10:00 a.m. on the fourth court day prior to the 7 scheduled hearing date. Motions will be removed from the court’s hearing calendar if the Joint 8 Statement is not timely filed or if courtesy copies are not timely delivered. In order to satisfy the 9 meet and confer requirement set forth in Local Rule 251(b), the parties must confer and talk to 10 each other in person, over the telephone or via video conferencing before the hearing about the 11 discovery dispute. The Court may issue sanctions against the moving party or the opposing party 12 if either party fails to meet and confer in good faith. 13 B. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 14 Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication: Although this portion of 15 phased discovery contemplates addressing only the issue of class certification, to the extent a 16 party believes, in good faith, that they could bring a motion for summary judgment or 17 adjudication—in good faith—the Court provides the following instructions. Prior to filing a 18 motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to 19 meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. 20 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment 21 where a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has 22 merit in whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of 23 briefing; 4) narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement 24 before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and 6) to arrive at a 25 Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 26 The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the Joint Statement of 27 Undisputed Facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall 28 file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 1 In the Notice of Motion, the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and 2 conferred as ordered above or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and 3 confer. 4 IX. Pre-Trial Conference and Trial Date 5 The pre-trial conference and trial date shall be addressed following completion of the 6 certification phase. 7 X. Settlement Conference 8 Should the parties desire a settlement conference, they will jointly request one of the 9 Court, and one will be arranged. In making such request, the parties are directed to notify the 10 Court as to whether or not they desire the undersigned to conduct the settlement conference or to 11 arrange for one before another judicial officer. 12 XI. Related Matters Pending 13 The parties’ scheduling report indicates that Plaintiff Lewis Brown contends that this case is 14 related to the lawsuit Wickey TwoHands and Joseph Quinney v. City of Fresno, No. 1:25-cv-01797- 15 KES-ECG. Additionally, the parties have indicated that this case is deemed related to Desiree 16 Martinez; We Are Not Invisible v. City of Fresno, No. 1:24-cv-00021-JLT-ECG and Cynthia 17 Piombino v. The City of Fresno, No. 1:24-cv-00298-KES-SAB. 18 XII. Compliance with Federal Procedure 19 All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 21 amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to 22 efficiently handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the 23 Rules as provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the 24 Eastern District of California. 25 Additional requirements and more detailed procedures for courtroom practice before 26 United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone can be found at the United States District Court 27 for the Eastern District of California’s website (www.caed.uscourts.gov) under Judges; United 28 States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone (SAB). In the area entitled “Case Management 1 Procedures,” there is a link to “Standard Information.” All parties and counsel shall comply with 2 the guidelines set forth therein. 3 XIII. Newer Admitted Attorneys and Motions before Judge Boone 4 The Court reviews motions set for hearing and makes a determination whether to vacate 5 the hearing if the Court deems oral argument is unnecessary. See L.R. 230(g). Recognizing the 6 value and importance of training attorneys, for a motion set or to be set for hearing, the Court 7 encourages the parties to consider assigning the oral argument to an attorney with seven (7) years 8 or less experience out of law school. If any party provides notification that such an attorney from 9 at least one side will argue the motion, the Court will go forward with the hearing as scheduled. 10 The parties shall place such notification within a separately entitled section after the conclusion of 11 the motion, opposition, or reply briefing. If no party provides such notice, the hearing may be 12 vacated without further notice. 13 XIV. Effect of this Order 14 The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 15 most suitable to address of the issue of class certification. If the parties determine at any time that 16 the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered to notify the court 17 immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent 18 status conference. 19 Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless 20 they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached 21 exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. The parties are 22 advised that due to the impacted nature of civil cases on the judges in the Eastern District of 23 California, Fresno Division, that stipulations to continue set dates are disfavored and will 24 not be granted absent good cause. 25 26 27 28 1 Lastly, should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to comply with the directions 2 | as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including 3 | monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed 4 | and/or ordered. 5 ris so oRpsne. DAA Le 7 | Dated: _ July 7, 2026 ; STANLEY A. BOONE 8 United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11390162. Public record. Not legal advice.