# Opinion

> District Court, E.D. California · June 26, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388946

## Case

- **Full name:** Judith D. Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** June 26, 2026
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388946

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JUDITH D. BROWN, No. 2:25-cv-03035-DC-JDP
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF
14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
SECURITY, ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
15
Defendant. (Doc. No. 20)
16

17
On October 20, 2025, Plaintiff Judith D. Brown filed this action seeking review of a final
18
decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On March 12, 2025, the
19
matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to
20
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 15.) On June 23, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation with the court
21
in which the parties agree that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access
22
to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $8,683.00, and no costs under 28
23
U.S.C. § 1920. (Doc. No. 20.)
24
Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ June 23, 2026 stipulation, the court
25
orders as follows:
26
1. Pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees
27
and expenses in the amount of $8,683.00;
28
1 2. No costs are awarded under 28 U.S.C. § 1920;
2 3. After the issuance of this order, the government shall consider the assignment of
3 the EAJA attorney’s fees to Plaintiff's counsel;
4 a. Pursuant to the decision in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), any such
5 assignment will depend on whether the attorney’s fees are subject to any
6 offset allowed under the United States Department of Treasury’s (“the
7 DOT”) Offset Program;
8 b. Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the DOT determines that
9 Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the
10 payment of attorney’s fees to be made directly to Plaintiff's counsel; and
11 4. Whether the payment of attorney’s fees is made payable to Plaintiff or to her
12 counsel, the check will be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel’s mailing address at:
13 Stephen Martin Sloan
Osterhout Berger Daley, LLC
14 4256 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste 104
Chicago, IL 60613
15
16
17
18 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19 Oc
Dated: _ June 25, 2026
20 Dena Coggins
5 United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388946. Public record. Not legal advice.