# Perkins

> District Court, E.D. California · June 24, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388622

## Case

- **Full name:** Lee Willis Bender v. D. Perkins, et al.
- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** June 24, 2026
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388622

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 LEE WILLIS BENDER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00805-KES-EPG (PC)
8 Plaintiff,

9 SCHEDULING ORDER

10 v. Exhaustion Motions: September 22, 2026
11
Motions to Compel: January 25, 2027
12 D. PERKINS, et al.,

13 Non-expert Discovery: February 24, 2027
Defendants.
14
Dispositive Motions: March 24, 2027
15

16

17 This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions.
18 I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES
19 Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests.
20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as
follows:
21
1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties:
22
a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for
23
information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under
24
Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2));
25
b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a written request that the
26
opposing party produce documents or electronically stored information,
27
“including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound
28
1 recordings, images, and other data or data compilations,” or a written request
2 that the opposing party produce any designated tangible things. Fed. R. Civ.
3 P. 34(a)(1));
4 c. Requests for Admissions (a request for admission is a written request that
the opposing party “admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth
5
of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1)” that relate to “(A) facts,
6
the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; [or] (B) the
7
genuineness of any described documents.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(1)); and
8
d. Depositions (a deposition is where one party (or that party’s counsel)
9
questions someone under oath, and a court reporter is present to record
10
the proceedings).
11
1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B),
12
Defendants may depose any witness confined in a prison on
13
the condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a
14
deposition, Defendants serve all parties with the notice required by
15
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to
16 participate in a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions
17 against Plaintiff, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of
18 this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4),
19 the parties may take any deposition under this section by video
20 conference without a further motion or order of the Court, relieving
21 the court reporter of the requirement to be in the physical presence
22 of the witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28(a)(1)
23 during that deposition.
2. If Plaintiff wishes to take a deposition, Plaintiff must file a motion
24
requesting the Court’s permission to do so. Before filing a motion,
25
Plaintiff must contract with a licensed court reporter, also known as
26
Certified Shorthand Reporters (CSRs). CSRs are not court
27
employees; they are private individuals. Plaintiff is responsible for
28
1 paying CSRs their fees for taking the deposition and producing
2 a transcript. Plaintiff’s pro se or in forma pauperis status does not
3 entitle Plaintiff to a free deposition. Every motion for leave to take
4 deposition must include the name of the person to be deposed,
the name and contact information for the court reporter with whom
5
Plaintiff contracted, the estimated cost for the CSR’s time and the
6
recording, and the source of funds for payment of that cost, or the
7
motion may be summarily denied for failure to comply with this
8
order. The Court may request input from Plaintiff’s institution of
9
confinement to determine if the deposition(s) can proceed in a safe
10
and secure manner before ruling on a motion for a deposition.
11
2. A party may serve on any other party no more than 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for
12
production of documents, and 15 requests for admission. If a party wishes to serve
13
additional discovery requests, that party may file a motion for additional discovery
14
requests with the Court, explaining why additional discovery requests are necessary.
15
3. Discovery requests and responses should be sent to the opposing part(ies), or their
16 counsel if represented. They should not be filed with the Court.
17 4. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the
18 request is first served. This means that written discovery requests must be served
19 within a timeframe that allows the opposing party a forty-five (45) day period to
20 respond prior to the close of non-expert discovery. Any party who is served a request
21 where the forty-five (45) day period for response would end after the close of non-
22 expert discovery is entitled to object to that request on the ground that the request is
23 untimely.
5. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily overruled by the Court.
24
Responses to document requests shall include all documents within a party’s
25
possession, custody, or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents are deemed to be
26
within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual possession,
27
custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on demand. If
28
1 Defendants cannot obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement,
2 Defendants shall clearly respond that a third-party subpoena will be necessary to
3 obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement.
4 6. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or
third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date,
5
author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty days
6
after the date that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within this time
7
shall result in a waiver of the privilege. Additionally, if a party is claiming a right to
8
withhold witness statements and/or evidence gathered from investigation into the
9
incident at issue in the complaint based on the official information privilege or
10
confidentiality, the withholding party shall submit the withheld witness statements
11
and/or evidence to the Court for in camera review, along with an explanation of why
12
the witness statements and/or evidence should be withheld.1 The witness statements
13
and/or evidence shall be Bates stamped and emailed to
14
EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The withholding party shall also file and serve a
15
notice that they have complied with this order. All other claims of privilege may be
16 challenged via a motion to compel.
17
1 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94–95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality of
18
those prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of an
19 administrative record that is helpful to the court. When a grievance is filed shortly after the event giving
rise to the grievance, witnesses can be identified and questioned while memories are still fresh, and
20 evidence can be gathered and preserved.”).
The “common law governmental privilege (encompassing and referred to sometimes as the official
21
or state secret privilege) . . . is only a qualified privilege, contingent upon the competing interests of the
22 requesting litigant and subject to disclosure. . . .” Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 511 F.2d 192,
198 (9th Cir. 1975) (citations omitted). The Ninth Circuit has since followed Kerr in requiring in camera
23 review and a balancing of interests in ruling on the government’s claim of the official information
24 privilege. See, e.g., Breed v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 542 F.2d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 1976) (“[A]s
required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing
25 with claims of governmental privilege.’”) (quoting Kerr v. U. S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 426 U.S.
394, 406 (1976)); Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana, 936 F.2d 1027, 1033–34 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended on
26
denial of reh’g (Feb. 27, 1991), as amended on denial of reh’g (May 24, 1991) (“Government personnel
27 files are considered official information. To determine whether the information sought is privileged, courts
must weigh the potential benefits of disclosure against the potential disadvantages. If the latter is greater,
28 the privilege bars discovery.”) (citations omitted).
1 7. If Plaintiff seeks documents from someone who is not a party in this case, Plaintiff
2 must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum with the Court. In any
3 request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1) identify the documents sought and from
4 whom; (2) explain why the documents are relevant to the claims in this case; and
(3) make a showing in the request that the records are only obtainable through a third
5
party. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a subpoena duces tecum,
6
commanding the production of documents from a non-party, and may command
7
service of the subpoena by the United States Marshals Service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; 28
8
U.S.C. § 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting such a request only if the
9
documents sought from the non-party are not obtainable from Defendants through a
10
Rule 34 request for production of documents.
11
8. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the
12
failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of
13
Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal
14
Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.
15
9. The parties have until January 25, 2027, to file motion(s) to compel further discovery
16 responses. Motions to compel can be used to challenge failure of a party to respond to
17 a discovery request, failure to produce documents on the basis of privilege, or failure
18 to produce privilege log. The motion(s) should include a copy of the request(s) and
19 any response to the request(s) at issue.
20 10. The Court will not require an informal discovery dispute conference prior to the filing
21 of any discovery motion. Nor are the parties required to follow the procedures set forth
22 in Local Rule 251 for dealing with discovery motions, including the preparation of a
23 joint discovery statement. Instead, the parties shall follow the briefing schedule
provided by Local Rule 230(l) for any discovery motion brought pursuant to Federal
24
Rules of Civil Procedure 26–37 and 45.
25
11. The parties are advised that each party is responsible for planning and timing their
26
own discovery. This means that the Court will not sua sponte extend the deadline for
27
28
1 any party to file motions to compel or to respond and/or serve written discovery
2 requests.
3 II. PAGE LIMITS, COURTESY COPIES, AND REQUIREMENT TO RESPOND
4 The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained before the filing
deadline,2 all moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda shall not exceed twenty-five (25)
5
pages. Reply briefs by the moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These page limits do not
6
include exhibits. The parties shall not file multiple or supplemental briefs to circumvent this rule.
7
Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, motions
8
concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55,
9
56, 59 and 60, and Local Rule 110, shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).3 Failure to
10
timely oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. Local Rule
11
230(l). Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not
12
signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. Opposition to all other motions need
13
be filed only as directed by the court.
14
Pursuant to Local Rule 133(j), depositions should not be filed. However, counsel
15
referencing a deposition in any filing must submit pertinent portions of the deposition as
16 exhibit(s). In addition, counsel should also email a copy of the entire deposition as a .pdf file to
17 EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov “and concurrently email or otherwise transmit the deposition to all
18 other parties.” L.R. 133(j). Counsel should not email links to file sharing services that require the
19 Court to download the deposition.
20 III. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
21 The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is February 24, 2027. As
22 discussed above, this deadline includes all written discovery requests and responses. Any written
23 discovery request must be made so that the opposing party is allowed the entire amount of time
allotted for response by this deadline.
24
25
26
27
2 Parties may seek leave by filing a short motion.
28 3 As noted below, the deadline to file oppositions is different for dispositive motions.
1 IV. EXHAUSTION MOTION DEADLINE
2 The deadline for Defendants to present any challenge for failure to exhaust administrative
3 remedies is September 22, 2026.4 Failure to raise the exhaustion defense by this deadline will
4 result in waiver of the defense. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 2014)
(providing that the exhaustion question should be decided as early as feasible).
5
V. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE
6
The deadline for filing dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment
7
(other than dispositive motions based on the defense of failure to exhaust administrative
8
remedies), is March 24, 2027. The deadline to file oppositions to dispositive motions, including
9
motions for summary judgment, is thirty days from the date the motion is filed. The deadline to
10
file replies to oppositions is fourteen days from the date the opposition is filed. If a party needs
11
an extension of any of these deadlines, that party may file a motion for an extension of time.
12
If Defendants file a motion for summary judgment, Defendants shall simultaneously
13
provide Plaintiff with the notice and warning required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th
14
Cir. 1998). In addition to the language suggested by Rand in Appendix A of that opinion, id. at
15
962, this notice must also include a short and plain statement of the Local Rule 260 requirements
16 and be titled “This Notice is Required to be Given to you by the Court.”
17 The parties are also advised of the following requirements regarding motions for summary
18 judgment contained in the Local Rules:
19 (a) Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication. Each motion
for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall be accompanied by a
20 “Statement of Undisputed Facts” that shall enumerate discretely each of the
specific material facts relied upon in support of the motion and cite the
21
particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory
22 answer, admission, or other document relied upon to establish that fact. The
moving party shall be responsible for the filing of all evidentiary documents
23 cited in the moving papers. See L.R. 133(j).
24 (b) Opposition. Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or
summary adjudication shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of
25 Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those
that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to the particular
26 portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer,

27 4 If Defendants need an extension of this deadline, Defendants shall file a motion requesting an
28 extension of this deadline.
1 admission, or other document relied upon in support of that denial. The
opposing party may also file a concise “Statement of Disputed Facts,” and
2
the source thereof in the record, of all additional material facts as to which
there is a genuine issue precluding summary judgment or adjudication. The
3
opposing party shall be responsible for the filing of all evidentiary
4 documents cited in the opposing papers. See L.R. 133(j). If a need for
discovery is asserted as a basis for denial of the motion, the party opposing
5 the motion shall provide a specification of the particular facts on which
discovery is to be had or the issues on which discovery is necessary.
6
Local Rule 260(a)–(b).
7
If Defendants file a motion for summary judgment, the accompanying Statement of
8
Undisputed facts shall contain an additional blank column titled “Plaintiff’s Response and
9
Supporting Evidence,” which Plaintiff may use to respond to each fact. Here is an example of a
10
format Defendants may follow:
11
Supporting Plaintiff’s Response and
12 Number Undisputed Material Fact Evidence Supporting Evidence
13 On X date, Plaintiff was confined X Decl. ¶ 20.
1.
at X institution.
14
2. The X incident alleged in the X interrogatory
15
complaint happened on X date. response.
16
3. Plaintiff saw Dr. Y on X date. Y Decl. ¶ 45.
17
18 Plaintiff may use Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts to comply with requirements
of Local Rule 260(b), which requires the responding party to “reproduce the itemized facts in the
19
Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those that are
20
disputed, including with each denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit,
21
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon in support of that
22
denial.” For example, Plaintiff may complete it as follows:
23
Supporting Plaintiff’s Response and
24 Number Undisputed Material Fact Evidence Supporting Evidence
25 On X date, Plaintiff was confined X Decl. ¶ 20. Admitted.
1.
at X institution.
26
2. The X incident alleged in the X interrogatory Denied. Pl. deposition
27
complaint happened on X date. response. at 2:4–6.
28
2 VI. FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES
3 If this case is still proceeding after dispositive motions have been resolved, or if no
4 dispositive motions are filed, the Court will set expert disclosure deadlines,’ a pretrial conference,
5 pretrial deadlines, and a trial date.
6 Additionally, within fourteen days after a final ruling on any dispositive motion, if the
7 || case proceeds, Defendants shall confer with Plaintiff and file a report indicating each party’s
8 || position on whether a settlement conference would be productive.
9 | VU. EFFECT OF THIS ORDER
10 This order represents the Court’s best estimated schedule through dispositive motions.
11 | Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an
12 | appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).
3 The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent
i4 |? showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
15 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
| DATED: _ June 24, 2026 jp See ey
19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
|—§_
> While the Court is not setting a deadline for expert disclosures at this time, the parties may
27 provide their expert disclosures at any time. Such disclosures must conform with Federal Rule of Civil
28 Procedure 26(a)(2)(B)-(C).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11388622. Public record. Not legal advice.