# Opinion

> District Court, E.D. California · April 9, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11380117

## Case

- **Full name:** Anthony Brown v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** April 9, 2026
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11380117

## Opinion text

1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
2 1990 N. California Blvd. 8th Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
3
Tel: (925) 222-7071
4 Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com

5
Attorney for Plaintiff
6 ANTHONY BROWN

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
ANTHONY BROWN, Case No. 2:25-cv-02897-AC
12
13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND
14 v. EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE
15 EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT;
FRANK BISIGNANO, [PROPOSED] ORDER
16 Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
19
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
20
attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $10,000.00, under the Equal Access to
21
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This
22
amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by
23
counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d),
24
25 1920.
26 The parties stipulate that the position of the United States was not substantially
27 justified in this case, and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees pursuant to
1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
2 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
3 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
4 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
5
allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
6
the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
7
subject to any offset.
8
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
9
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
10
the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel,
11
Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.
12
Payments may be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT) or by check.
13
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
14
EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
15
Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
16
constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
17
Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have
18
relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
19
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek
20
Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings
21
clause provisions of the EAJA.
22

23
Respectfully submitted,
24
25 Dated: April 9, 2026 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides

26 By: /s/ Francesco Benavides
27 FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES
Attorney for Plaintiff
1

2 Dated: April 9, 2026 ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
3
MATHEW W. PILE
4 Head of Program Litigation 1
Social Security Administration
5

6 By: Joseph Langkamer*
JOSEPH LANGKAMER
7
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
8 Attorneys for Defendant
9 (*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on April 9, 2026).
10

11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the

5 | amount of $10,000.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs under 28 U.S.C.
6 || § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.
7
8 || DATED: April 9, 2026 ~

10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11380117. Public record. Not legal advice.