# Opinion

> District Court, C.D. California · February 5, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11359609

## Case

- **Full name:** Jin Liu v. Noem Kristi et al
- **Court:** District Court, C.D. California
- **Decided:** February 5, 2026
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11359609

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL ‘ Until such a claim is raised, the Court need not resolve the questions of whether ankle
monitoring amounts to “custody” for the purpose of jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or whether the imposition of such a condition of
release pursuant to statutory and regulatory authority constitutes a due process violation.
4 The Court does not require Petitioner to file an amended petition. Nor should the
Court’s allowance of an opportunity to file an amended petition be construed as a
determination that there is merit to a potential claim.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11359609. Public record. Not legal advice.