# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · October 18, 2006 · 940 So. 2d 498

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1135258

## Case

- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** October 18, 2006
- **Citations:** 940 So. 2d 498; 2006 WL 2956284
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1135258

## Opinion text

940 So.2d 498 (2006)
Isac Quincy BROWN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-3233.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
October 18, 2006.
Isac Quincy Brown, South Bay, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of Brown's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he seeks retroactive application of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we did in Thomas v. State, 914 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to the extent that the court applied Blakely retroactively.
GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1135258. Public record. Not legal advice.