# McCloud v. Lorain Cty. Corr. Inst.

> Ohio Court of Appeals · June 15, 2026 · 2026 Ohio 2231

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11342711

## Case

- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 15, 2026
- **Citations:** 2026 Ohio 2231
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11342711

## Opinion text

[Cite as McCloud v. Lorain Cty. Corr. Inst., 2026-Ohio-2231.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF LORAIN )

ANTONIO CHEETAH MCCLOUD

Petitioner C.A. No. 26CA000102

v.

WARDEN, LORAIN CORRECTIONAL ORIGINAL ACTION IN
INSTITUTION HABEAS CORPUS

Respondent

Dated:

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Antonio Cheetah McCloud, an inmate in the Richland Correctional Institution,

filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to order the warden of the Lorain Correctional

Institution to release him from custody. Because R.C. 2725.03 provides that jurisdiction is proper

only in the county in which the petitioner is incarcerated, this Court dismisses this case.

{¶2} Section 3(B)(1), Article IV, of the Ohio Constitution grants appellate courts

original jurisdiction over the writ of habeas corpus. This Court’s jurisdiction, however,

is limited by R.C. 2725.03. That section provides that if a person is incarcerated in a state

correctional institution, only the courts or judges of “the county in which the institution

is located has jurisdiction to issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for his production

or discharge.”

{¶3} Mr. McCloud is incarcerated in a state correctional institution in Richland

County. Thus, pursuant to R.C. 2725.03, only the courts or judges of Richland County
2

have jurisdiction over his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. State ex rel. Robinson v.

Fender, 2022-Ohio-3701, ¶ 5. When a petition is filed in the wrong county, dismissal is

appropriate. Id. at ¶ 5-6; Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-5592, ¶ 1.

Pursuant to R.C. 2725.03, therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the petition.

{¶4} Because jurisdiction does not lie in this Court to consider Mr. McCloud’s

petition, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. McCloud.

{¶5} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58.

JILL FLAGG LANZINGER
FOR THE COURT
HENSAL, J.
SUTTON, J.
CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

ANTONIO CHEETAH MCCLOUD, Pro se, Petitioner.

D. ANDREW WILSON, Ohio Attorney General, for Respondent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11342711. Public record. Not legal advice.