# Opinion

> District Court, E.D. Arkansas · March 10, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11340395

## Case

- **Full name:** Jeremy Kennedy v. Joseph Gossett and Brandon Brown
- **Court:** District Court, E.D. Arkansas
- **Decided:** March 10, 2026
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11340395

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION

JEREMY KENNEDY PLAINTIFF
ADC #093061

No. 4:24-cv-219-DPM

JOSEPH GOSSETT and BRANDON
BROWN DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Kennedy has filed a second motion seeking judgment as a matter
of law on his claims against Gossett. Gossett didn’t respond.
Kennedy has worked the case hard and well. His arguments are
thorough and well presented. He has solid claims to take to ajury. But
he isn’t entitled to summary judgment for the reasons stated in the
Order, Doc. 164, denying his first motion for summary judgment and as
explained below.
Malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The malicious
prosecution claim fails. Yes, the original misdemeanor charges were
dismissed. But that was because felony charges were filed. And
Kennedy pleaded guilty to those felonies. This claim should be
dismissed. South Arkansas Petroleum Co. v. Schiesser, 343 Ark. 492, 495,
36 S.W.3d 317, 319 (2001). So, suffice to say, Kennedy isn’t entitled to

summary judgment. He abandons his abuse of process claim.
Doc. 194 at 15.
Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 4.6. There isn’t a due
process claim for violating this rule. And the rule doesn’t create a
private right of action. E.g., Wellman v. Supreme Court of Ohio, 2018 WL
9651499, at *3 (6th Cir. 13 November 2018) (unpublished per curiam).
Kennedy isn’t entitled to summary judgment.
Excessive force and deliberate indifference. These are
Kennedy’s strongest claims. He may prevail on them before ajury. But
he isn’t entitled to summary judgment. Doc. 164 at 5.
Yard search claims. Kennedy abandons the trespass claim. He
isn’t entitled to summary judgment on the yard search claim. The
Arkansas Supreme Court has rejected his reading of the parole waiver
statute. McFerrin v. State, 344 Ark. 671, 679, 42 S.W.3d 529, 534-35
(2001).
Cell phone claims. Kennedy abandons some of his cell phone-
related claims. Doc. 194 at 12-14. The record remains fuzzy about what
happened with the cell phones. A trial is needed on the claims Kennedy
hasn’t abandoned. Davidson & Associates v. Jung, 422 F.3d 630, 638 (8th
Cir. 2005).
Illegal detention claims. Kennedy abandons (or clarifies) some
of these claims. Doc. 194 at 14-18. His remaining claims aren’t suitable
for summary judgment, as the Court explained in its last Order.

-2-

Kennedy’s second motion for summary judgment, Doc. 192, is
denied. His abandoned claims are dismissed without prejudice. Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). An updated appendix listing the status of the claims
in the third amended complaint is attached. Kennedy’s motion for
copies, Doc. 200, is denied because Gossett didn’t file a response to the
second motion for summary judgment.
This case is currently set for trial 28 July 2026. Kennedy has done
a fine job as a pro se litigant. But his pro se status has presented
challenges, too. The Court will appoint a lawyer for him at this point if
he wants one. In addition to representing Kennedy at trial, a lawyer
would be a help preparing for trial: in subpoenaing witnesses, filing
motions in limine, marshalling evidence, and drafting jury instructions.
If Kennedy wants an appointed lawyer, he should file a motion by
27 March 2026.
A pretrial status conference would benefit everyone involved in
this case. The Court refers the case to Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe to
hold one and to appoint counsel if Kennedy requests one.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
10 Mercr ADA

-3-

APPENDIX - 10 MARCH 2026

Brandon Brown, §1983, Illegal Search | Pending. Brown is
Officer, Bald Knob (9 144-153) in default. Doc. 143
Police Department &144.
§1983, Excessive Dismissed without
Force (§[§ 154-159) prejudice, failure to
. state aclaim. Doc. 80.
Joseph Gossett §1983, Illegal Arrest | Dismissed without
160-165) prejudice. Doc. 80.
Malady v. Crunk, 902
F.2d 10, 11-12 (8th
Cir. 1990).
81983, Unlawful Dismissed without
Detention (4 164) prejudice. Doc. 80.
Malady v. Crunk, 902
F.2d 10, 11-12 (8th
Cir. 1990).

Prosecution □□□ 166-
185
Violation of Arkansas | Pending.
Rule of Criminal
Procedure 4.6
186-190)
frome gis)
Force (191-195
§ 1983 Deliberate Pending.
Indifference (4 196-
199)
of Yards (J 200-206)

ee Brame Doe 201.
Dismissed. Doc. 201.
§1983, Illegal Search | Pending.
ee
Phones (§[§{ 207-211
EatPhones
Cell Phones (4 212
Fat BIRT ismsced Doc 201.
213) Dismissed. Doc. 201.
Conversion(]. 214) {Pending
Dismissed Doe. 20
Dismissed. Doc. 201.
Arkansas’s Statutory | Pending.
Right to be Released
on Bail 215-217
rising ismtaed Doe 200.
218-221 Dismissed. Doc. 201.
§1983, Illegal Pending.
Detention for failure
to give affidavit in 48
hours ({ {J 222-228
§1983, Illegal Pending.
Detention because of
false statements in
affidavit (| {229-232
eat [Reel
Detention (4 233- Dismissed. Doc. 201.
234
Libel (| 235-238) Dismissed without
prejudice, failure to
state aclaim. Doc. 80.
Matthew Rainwater | § 1983 Deliberate Voluntarily
Indifference (4 239- | dismissed. Doc. 143.
246)

Cameron Hughes, § 1983 Deliberate Dismissed without
LPN Indifference 247- | prejudice, failure to
248 state aclaim. Doc. 80.
aig OT Ue,
248 dismissed. Doc. 143.
White County § 1983 Deliberate Voluntarily
Detention Center Indifference (4 249- | dismissed. Doc. 143.
Medical Director 250, 256-25
| eege a [a ms
malpractice □□□ 249- | dismissed. Doc. 143.
250, 258
White County § 1983 Deliberate Voluntarily
Detention Center Indifference ({ 249, | dismissed. Doc. 143.
Nurse | 251-252, 256-257)
Negligence/medical | Voluntarily
malpractice 249-
250, 258)
White County § 1983 Deliberate Voluntarily
Detention Center Indifference ({ 249, | dismissed. Doc. 143.
Nurse II 251, 253, 256-25
ee
malpractice ({[ 249- | dismissed. Doc. 143.
250, 253, 258
White County § 1983 Deliberate Dismissed without
Detention Center Indifference (J 249, | prejudice, failure to
Nurse III 251, 256-257, 259 state acclaim. Doc. 80.
ee
malpractice (J 249- | prejudice, failure to
250, 258-259 state aclaim. Doc. 80.

Detention Center Indifference 249, | dismissed. Doc. 143.
Nurse IV 251, 254, 256-257, 260)

Negligence/medical | Voluntarily
malpractice 249- | dismissed. Doc. 143.
250, 254, 258, 260

Detention Center Indifference ({{ 249, | prejudice, failure to
Nurse V 251, 255, 256-25 state aclaim. Doc. 80.
Negligence/medical | Dismissed without
ee 250, 255, 258) state aclaim. Doc. 80.
White County § 1983 Deliberate Dismissed with
Indifference, prejudice. Doc. 183-1.
Municipal Liability
{261-265
Indifference ({266- | prejudice, failure to
268 state aclaim. Doc. 80.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11340395. Public record. Not legal advice.
