# Stephen Price v. Board of Education of Howard County

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 9, 2026

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11253425

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 9, 2026
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11253425

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1487 Doc: 16 Filed: 02/09/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1487

STEPHEN PRICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HOWARD COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Matthew James Maddox, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00541-MJM)

Submitted: December 16, 2025 Decided: February 9, 2026

Before KING, GREGORY, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Price, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Wayne Nussbaum, NUSSBAUM LAW, LLC,
Clarksville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1487 Doc: 16 Filed: 02/09/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Price appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary

judgment on Price’s failure-to-accommodate claim, brought pursuant to the American with

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, and denying Price’s motions for leave to

amend, to strike Defendant’s affidavits, and for leave to file a surreply. * We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

Price v. Bd. of Educ. of Howard Cnty., No. 1:22-cv-00541-MJM (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2025).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

*
Defendant has filed a motion to strike Price’s informal reply brief, which we deny.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11253425. Public record. Not legal advice.