# Elmore v. Long Beach Post Office

> District Court, District of Columbia · December 31, 2025

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11234021

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** December 31, 2025
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Ana C. Reyes
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11234021

## Opinion text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MATTHEW ROBERT ELMORE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2256 (UNA)
)
LONG BEACH POST OFFICE, )
)
Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court GRANTS the application and, for the reasons

stated below, DISMISSES the complaint and this civil action without prejudice.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro

se litigants are held to less stringent standards than are applied to formal pleadings drafted by

lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule

8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain

statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement

of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief

the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give

fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer,

to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res

judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

1
Plaintiff alleges there are “no guards” at a Post Office in Long Beach, California, Compl.

at 3, and staff there “don[’]t electronically scan [his] Id [sic],” id. at 4. These meager assertions

fall short of the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a), and therefore, the complaint will

be dismissed.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: December 31, 2025 /s/
ANA C. REYES
United States District Judge

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11234021. Public record. Not legal advice.