# Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · January 10, 1996 · 74 Ohio St. 3d 228

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11153472

## Case

- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 10, 1996
- **Citations:** 74 Ohio St. 3d 228; 1996 Ohio 97
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11153472

## Opinion text

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 228.]

MIDDLETON, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.,
APPELLEES.
[Cite as Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-97.]
Taxation—Real property valuation—Party does not have standing to file a
complaint seeking a decrease in the value of property owned by another—
R.,C. 5715.13, construed and applied.
(Nos. 94-2399, 94-2534, 95-300 and 95-463—Submitted December 6, 1995—
Decided January 10, 1996.)
APPEALS from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 94-P-158, 94-K-468, 94-K-1137
and 94-D-1126.
__________________
David J. Middleton, pro se.
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Marilyn Barkley Cassidy, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Cuyahoga
County Board of Revision and Cuyahoga County Auditor.
Armstrong, Mitchell & Damiani, Timothy J. Armstrong and Victor V.
Anselmo, for appellee Cleveland Board of Education in case Nos. 94-2399 and 95-
300.
Kelly, McCann & Livingstone and Robert A. Brindza, for appellee
Cuyahoga Heights Board of Education in case No. 94-2534.
Kadish & Bender, Kevin M. Hinkel and David G. Lambert, for appellee
Board of Education for the Berea City School District in case No. 95-463.
Rosenzweig, Schulz & Gillombardo Co., L.P.A., and Bill J. Gagliano,
urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Westlake Board of Education in case No. 94-
2399.
__________________
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

{¶ 1} Case Nos. 94-2399, 94-2534, 95-300 and 95-463 are consolidated.
{¶ 2} The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed on the
authority of Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d
___, ___ N.E.2d ___, decided today.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and
COOK, JJ., concur.
__________________

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11153472. Public record. Not legal advice.