# Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 4, 2002 · 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11152718

## Case

- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 4, 2002
- **Citations:** 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219; 2002 Ohio 6297
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11152718

## Opinion text

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 1219.]

CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CLERMONT COUNTY
BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision,
2002-Ohio-6297.]
Joint motion to remand sustained.
(No. 2002-0961—Submitted November 13, 2002—Decided December 4, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 98-K-707 and 98-K-708.
__________________
{¶1} This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of
Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand,
{¶2} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the joint motion to remand be, and
hereby is, sustained. We acknowledge that, under Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v.
Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165, 2002-Ohio-4033, 772 N.E.2d 1160,
the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set
forth in R.C. 5717.01. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the
settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with
directions to remand this cause to the Clermont County Board of Revision to
implement the mediated agreement of the parties.
{¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their
respective costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax
Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be
certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
COOK, J., concurs in judgment.
__________________
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Raymond D. Anderson and Scott
J. Ziance; Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and Todd S. Swatsler; and Julie L. Ezell,
for appellant.
Donald A. White, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Allan Lee
Edwards, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Clermont County Board of
Revision and Clermont County Auditor.
Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and David C. DiMuzio, for appellees New
Richmond Exempted Village Board of Education and U.S. Grant Vocational
School District Board of Education.
Strauss & Troy, L.P.A., and Franklin A. Klaine, for appellee city of
Moscow.
Alan C. Motta, for appellee Washington Township Board of Trustees.
__________________

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11152718. Public record. Not legal advice.