# Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 1, 1998 · 82 Ohio St. 3d 305

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11151034

## Case

- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 1, 1998
- **Citations:** 82 Ohio St. 3d 305; 1998 Ohio 383
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11151034

## Opinion text

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 305.]

CORPORATE EXCHANGE BUILDINGS IV & V, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of
Revision, 1998-Ohio-383.]
Taxation—Real property valuation of office buildings on two nonadjacent parcels
where purchase price was not allocated at time of sale—Board of Tax
Appeals may approve board of revision’s valuation of each parcel, when.
(No. 97-997—Submitted January 27, 1998—Decided July 1, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 95-A-465.
__________________
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} This case concerns the valuation of parcel number 183730 as
described in case No. 97-996. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed
on the authority of Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of
Revision (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 297, 695 N.E.2d 743, decided today.
Decision affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and COOK, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
__________________
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.
{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Corporate
Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 82 Ohio
St.3d 297, 301-304, 695 N.E.2d 743, 745-748, decided this day, I also dissent with
respect to this parcel’s valuation.
PFEIFER, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
__________________

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11151034. Public record. Not legal advice.