# Ho v. United States

> District Court, N.D. California · July 30, 2025

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11111749

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, N.D. California
- **Decided:** July 30, 2025
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11111749

## Opinion text

1

2

3

4

5

6

7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
9

10
JIAN-CI HO, ) Case No. 4:24-cv-01538
11 )
Plaintiff, ) REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL
12 ) JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
v. )
13
)
14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
15 Defendant. )
_______________________________________)
16
17 The United States District Court of the Northern District of California presents its
18 compliments to the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan, and requests judicial assistance to
19 obtain evidence to be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the above captioned matter.
20 This Court requests the assistance described herein as necessary in the interests of justice.
21 The assistance requested is that the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan make available to
22 the United States:
23 (1) corporate filings by Atum Technology Corporation with Taiwan’s Ministry of
24 Economic Affairs and the registration authority, Taipei City Government;
25 (2) the complete file of the prosecution filings and the court filings in Shilin District
26 Court Year 2016 Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment;

27
1 (3) filings in any cases concerning the bankruptcy, liquidation, or dissolution of Atum
2 Technology Corporation; and
3 (4) documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
4 Technology Corporation in the possession of Chiao Yu-Cheng, Yen Wei-Hua(嚴偉華
5 ), Ma Wen-Ch’ang (馬文昌), Kuo Ming-Huang (郭明煌), Wu Hsieh-Lin (吳協霖),
6 Yen T’ing-Yu (嚴庭鈺), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Lee Wei-Hua (李緯華), Huang
7 Yu-Wen (黃郁文), and Chung Ting-Ch’ang (鍾鼎昌).
8 I. Summary of Action
9 The United States seeks information regarding Jian-Ci Ho’s control over Taiwanese
10 corporation Atum Technology Corporation to defend against Mr. Ho’s claim seeking refund of
11 certain payments to the United States’ Internal Revenue Service for failing to comply with U.S.
12 law.
13 In 2019, the United States Internal Revenue Service determined that Mr. Ho had failed to
14 report control from 1998 through 2013 over four foreign corporations in the British Virgin
15 Islands—Geneticware Co., Ltd., Pyramid Principles Company Ltd., Paramount Pride Company
16 Ltd., and Peak Picture Company, Ltd.—and one Japanese corporation—Revatron Co., Ltd.
17 Consistent with this determination, the Internal Revenue Service concluded that Mr. Ho owed
18 over $3 million. In 2020 and 2022, Mr. Ho paid the assessed amount against him for his failure
19 to report his control over Peak Picture Company, Ltd. in 2012. On March 13, 2024, Mr. Ho filed
20 this case against the United States in the District Court for the Northern District of California for
21 a refund of these payments. On July 31, 2024, the United States counterclaimed for the rest of
22 the outstanding assessments.
23 The majority shareholder of three of the corporations—Pyramid Principles Company
24 Ltd., Paramount Pride Company, Ltd., and Peak Picture Company, Ltd.—was Atum Technology
25 Corporation. Atum Technology Corporation was incorporated in Taiwan and registered with
26 Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs. For at least a portion of the time periods at issue, Atum

Technology Corporation may have been a publicly traded corporation in Taiwan.
27
1 The United States alleges that Mr. Ho controlled Atum Technology Corporation from
2 1998 through 2012 and thus controlled Pyramid Principles Company, Ltd., Paramount Pride
3 Company, Ltd., and Peak Picture Company, Ltd. through Atum Technology Corporation during
4 those years. To prove this, the United States must show that Mr. Ho owned, either directly,
5 indirectly, or constructively, stock representing more than 50% of the combined voting power of
6 all classes of Atum Technology Corporation’s stock entitled to vote or more than 50% of the
7 total value of shares of all classes of stock in Atum Technology Corporation from 1998 through
8 2012.
9 Mr. Ho alleges that the majority of the shares of Atum Technology Corporation were
10 held by persons other than himself, including persons or entities affiliated with Arthur Chiao,
11 also known as Chiao Yu-Cheng. Mr. Chiao is a Taiwanese citizen and the chairman and CEO of
12 Taiwanese corporation Winbond Electronics Corporation.
13 II. Necessity of the Assistance Requested
14 Evidence regarding the extent of Mr. Ho’s ownership interest in the Atum Technology
15 Corporation is necessary for this Court to resolve the dispute between Mr. Ho and the United
16 States over whether Mr. Ho is liable for penalties for failing to report his control over companies
17 owned through Atum Technology Corporation.
18 Mr. Ho was chairman of Atum Technology Corporation during the years at issue, but he
19 no longer has complete records regarding the shareholders of Atum Technology Corporation for
20 those years. Mr. Ho alleges that he never held a controlling interest in Atum Technology
21 Corporation and that Atum Technology Corporation filed for “the equivalent of bankruptcy in
22 2004” and was judicially dissolved in 2007.
23 Also, Taiwan’s Judicial Search System reflects that a criminal case was filed against Mr.
24 Ho in Shilin District Court for violating Article 9 of Taiwan’s Company Act in his
25 representations regarding Atum Technology Corporation’s shares in its incorporation
26 application. This case is Shilin District Court Year 2016 Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment.

Mr. Ho alleges that Mr. Chiao filed the initial criminal complaint that led to this criminal case
27
1 against him. Mr. Ho has also provided a copy of a criminal complaint that Atum Technology
2 Corporation filed against Mr. Chiao. However, Mr. Ho does not have the supporting exhibits.
3 This criminal complaint is attached as Exhibit 1.
4 Furthermore, information from the criminal case against Mr. Ho, Shilin District Court
5 Year 2016 Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment, may be relevant to whether Mr. Ho directly,
6 indirectly, or constructively owned the majority of the shares or voting power in Atum
7 Technology Corporation during the years at issue. Because not all the records from this criminal
8 case are publicly available, these records are not otherwise obtainable. Additionally, information
9 about Atum Technology Corporation and its ownership may have been obtained by the Control
10 Yuan in connection with an investigation into the prosecutors’ issuance of an arrest warrant
11 against Mr. Ho in the criminal case described above, that culminated in a decision issued by that
12 body on September 16, 2003 as Document No. (92) Court Registry Bureau Letter No.
13 0922601576.
14 Finally, additional information regarding Atum Technology and its ownership may be
15 found in the files of the Shih Lin Branch of the Executive Yuan’s Ministry of Justice
16 Administrative Enforcement Agency, which issued an order on September 29, 2014 at the
17 request of one of Atum Technology Corporation’s liquidators, Yeh Huifang, preventing a third
18 party from collecting against certain rights held by Atum. See Document No: Shih Chih Ting
19 Year 96 Tax Enforcement Specialized Code No. 00025549.
20 And if there was a bankruptcy case involving Atum Technology Corporation, records
21 from that case may be relevant to determining the extent of Mr. Ho’s ownership in Atum
22 Technology Corporation and what years Atum Technology Corporation operated. Because Mr.
23 Ho does not have these records, these bankruptcy records are not otherwise obtainable through
24 this Court’s compulsory process.
25 Other Taiwanese citizens and corporations involved in Atum Technology Corporation as
26 its officers or shareholders, or who performed services for Atum Technology Corporation, may

have information regarding the ownership of the company. For example, Mr. Ho maintains that
27
1 the majority of the shares of Atum Technology Corporation were held by persons or entities
2 affiliated with Taiwanese citizen Chiao Yu-Cheng. Thus, Chiao Yu-Cheng, as well as other
3 officers and shareholders of Atum Technology Corporation, may have documents containing
4 information about the ownership of shares in Atum Technology Corporation.
5 These records are not obtainable through this Court’s compulsory process. It is thus in the
6 interests of justice for Taiwan to provide Atum Technology Corporation’s records. This Court,
7 like all federal U.S. courts, is authorized to issue a letter rogatory or request for such evidence
8 and testimony pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1781, and also has inherent authority to do so. See United
9 States v. Staples, 256 F.2d 290, 292 (9th Cir. 1958).
10 III. Assistance Requested
11 Please note that the party who made the request will reimburse any reasonable costs
12 incurred in complying with the request and provide any additional assistance necessary to fulfill
13 the request, as indicated below.
14 A. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Taipei City Government
15 To determine the extent of Mr. Ho’s control over Atum Technology Corporation from
16 1998 through 2012, this Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the
17 Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process
18 to make available to this Court the following documents from Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic
19 Affairs and Taipei City Government:
20 • Atum Technology Corporation’s corporate filings, including any articles of
21 incorporation, bylaws, records of dissolution, and documents with information
22 regarding shareholders, the distribution of shares, the voting power of shares or
23 shareholders, assets, and liabilities of Atum Technology Corporation from 1998
24 through 2012.
25 The United States agrees that it will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in
26 complying with this request. The United States has authorized Lily Lin of Stellex Law Firm to

represent its interests and serve as its counsel in the execution of this request, as well as the
27
1 requests set out in sections B-F. Please contact Ms. Lin for any questions or notices regarding
2 these requests. Ms. Lin’s contact information is:

3 Lily Lin
Stellex Law Firm
4
16F., No.109, Sec. 3, Minsheng E. Rd.
5 Songshan Dist., Taipei City 105
Taiwan
6 +886-2-2712-9096 Ext. 635
lily.lin@stellexlaw.com
7
B. Shilin District Court Prosecution and Court Filings
8
The Court thus respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate
9
Judicial Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make
10
available to this Court the following documents regarding in Shilin District Court Year 2016
11
Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment:
12
• The complete file of the prosecution filings in Shilin District Court Year 2016
13
Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment;
14
• The complete court filings of the first instance in Shilin District Court Year 2016
15
Shu-Chi-Zhi No. 24 Criminal Judgment; and
16
• The exhibits attached to the criminal complaint filed by Atum Technology
17
Corporation against Arthur Chiao (attached as Exhibit 1) and any prosecution
18
files related to that complaint.
19
The United States agrees that it will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in
20
complying with this request.
21
C. Control Yuan
22
Similarly, this Court also request that the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan issue
23
appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to this Court the following
24
documents from the Control Yuan:
25
• Files related to the Control Yuan’s investigation of the prosecutor’s conduct
26
during the 2003 investigation described above, including the files in relation to
27
1 the letter dated September 16, 2003 as Document No. (92) Court Registry Bureau
2 Letter No. 0922601576 and;
3 • Files related to any investigation of Arthur Chiao initiated prior to 2004 in
4 response to complaints filed by Mr. Ho prior to his departure from Taiwan.
5 The United States agrees that it will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in
6 complying with this request.
7 D. Ministry of Justice, Administrative Enforcement Agency
8 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
9 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
10 this Court the following documents from the Ministry of Justice, Administrative Enforcement
11 Agency:
12 • Files related to the Shih-Lin Branch of the Executive Yuan’s Ministry of Justice
13 Administrative Enforcement Agency 2014 decision regarding who is entitled to
14 funds potentially belonging to Atum Technology Corporation.
15 The United States agrees that it will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in
16 complying with this request.
17 E. Judicial Yuan and Bankruptcy Body
18 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
19 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
20 this Court the following documents from the Judicial Yuan and any other relevant body:
21 • Complete court filings of any cases concerning the bankruptcy, dissolution, or
22 liquidation of Atum Technology Corporation.
23 The United States agrees that it will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in
24 complying with this request.
25 F. Arthur Chiao/Chiao Yu-Cheng
26 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial

Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
27
1 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Chiao Yu-Cheng
2 (also known as Arthur Chiao), an individual associated with Atum Technology Corporation.
3 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
4 Technology Corporation.
5 Mr. Chiao is a Taiwanese citizen who resides in Taiwan. His business address is
6 Winbond Electronic Corporation – CTSP Fab, No. 8, Keya 1st Road, Daya District, Central
7 Taiwan Science Park, Taichung City 428303, Taiwan. The United States agrees that it will
8 reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with this request.
9 G. Yen Wei-Hua (嚴偉華)
10 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
11 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
12 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of 嚴偉華Yen Wei-
13 Hua, the Chief Financial Officer of Atum Technology Corporation prior to 2003:
14 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
15 Technology Corporation.
16 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
17 this request. With respect to Mr. Yen and those individuals set out in sections H-K and M-O
18 below, Mr. Ho and his counsel are still attempting to obtain current addresses for these
19 individuals. If the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan has difficulty locating these
20 individuals, it may contact Mr. Ho’s attorney to determine if current addresses have been
21 located. Mr. Ho’s attorney. John Colvin, can be reached at (01)(206) 223-0800 or via email at
22 jcolvin2@colvinhallettlaw.com.
23 H. Ma Wen-Ch’ang (馬文昌)
24 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
25 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
26 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of 馬文昌Ma Wen-

27 Ch’ang, the Chief Financial Officer of Atum Technology Corporation after 2003:
1 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
2 Technology Corporation.
3 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
4 this request.
5 I. Kuo Ming-Huang (郭明煌)
6 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
7 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
8 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of 郭明煌Kuo Ming-
9 Huang, a former board member and 旭展Chief Executive Officer of Atum Technol ogy
10 Corporation:
11 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
12 Technology Corporation.
13 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
14 this request.
15 J. Wu Hsieh-Lin (吳協霖)
16 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
17 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
18 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Wu Hsieh-Lin, a
19 former board member of Atum Technology Corporation:
20 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
21 Technology Corporation.
22 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
23 this request.
24 K. Yen T’ing-Yu (嚴庭鈺)
25 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
26 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to

27
1 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Yen T’ing-Yu, a
2 former attorney of Atum Technology Corporation:
3 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
4 Technology Corporation.
5 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
6 this request.
7 L. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
8 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
9 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
10 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Deloitte Touche
11 Tohmatsu, former accountants for Atum Technology Corporation, located at 20F, Taipei Nan
12 Shan Plaza, No. 100, Songren Rd., Xinyi Dist., Taipei 110421, Taiwan.
13 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
14 Technology Corporation.
15 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
16 this request.
17 M. Lee Wei-Hua (李緯華)
18 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
19 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
20 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Lee Wei-Hua, a
21 former shareholder of Atum Technology Corporation:
22 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
23 Technology Corporation.
24 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
25 this request.
26

27
1 N. Huang Yu-Wen (黃郁文)
2 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
3 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
4 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Huang Yu-Wen, a
5 former shareholder and founder of Atum Technology Corporation:
6 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
7 Technology Corporation.
8 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
9 this request.
10 O. Chung Ting-Ch’ang (鍾鼎昌),
11 The Court respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, the Appropriate Judicial
12 Authority of Taiwan issue appropriate orders, subpoenas, or other process to make available to
13 this Court the following documents in the possession, custody or control of Chung Ting-Ch’ang,
14 an investigator with the Taiwan Investigation Bureau who investigated the allegations against
15 Mr. Ho:
16 • All documents containing information regarding the ownership of shares in Atum
17 Technology Corporation.
18 Mr. Ho agrees that he will reimburse any reasonable costs incurred in complying with
19 this request.
20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, this Court stands ready to extend similar assistance to the
21 Courts of Taiwan in like cases.
22 Dated: __J_u_l_y_ 3_0_,_ 2_0_2_5___
23
24
25 ____________________________________
26 HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
27

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11111749. Public record. Not legal advice.