# Fred Jackson v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · February 2, 2022 · 2022 Ark. App. 43

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11076516

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** February 2, 2022
- **Citations:** 2022 Ark. App. 43
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11076516

## Opinion text

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 43
Elizabeth Perry
I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
integrity of this document DIVISION IV
2023.08.21 11:38:26 -05'00' No. E-21-215
2023.003.20269

FRED JACKSON Opinion Delivered February 2, 2022
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS
BOARD OF REVIEW
V.
[NO. 2021-BR-01219]
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF
WORKFORCE SERVICES AFFIRMED
APPELLEE

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge

Fred Jackson appeals the Arkansas Board of Review’s (the Board’s) decision that was

mailed on April 22, 2021. In the decision, the Board affirmed the decision of the Appeal

Tribunal, which conducted a hearing on January 8, 2021. The Appeal Tribunal affirmed

the Division of Workforce Services’ issuance of a “Notice of Non-Fraud Overpayment

Determination” to Jackson on September 25, 2020, finding he was liable to repay $940 in

benefits pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 11-10-532(b) (Supp. 2021). We

affirm the Board’s decision but note that in the record before us, Jackson provides

confirmation that he has made payment to satisfy the overpayment determination.

In Jackson’s petition for review, he includes a copy of a personal check for the

overpayment amount of $940, dated February 2, 2021, and deposited into an account of

the Arkansas Division of Workforce Services. We therefore affirm the decision with the
acknowledgement that Jackson has satisfied the overpayment decision by the payment in

full of $940 to the agency. No further action is needed at this time.

Affirmed.

BARRETT and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Fred L. Jackson, pro se appellant.

Cynthia L. Uhrynowycz, Associate General Counsel, for appellee.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/11076516. Public record. Not legal advice.